Why Sivakarthikeyan’s “Amaran” did not reveal Mukund Varadarajan”s communal identity? – Director answers

The Diwali blockbuster “Amaran”, starring Sivakarthikeyan, has stirred conversations on social media, with some netizens questioning why the film, based on the life of Tamil Nadu’s decorated army hero Major Mukund Varadarajan, omits any reference to his caste identity. Director Rajkumar Periyasamy recently responded to the discussions, explaining this narrative choice.

“Amaran”, which has reportedly grossed over ₹100 crore worldwide in its opening weekend, is inspired by Major Mukund Varadarajan’s life and sacrifice. Although Varadarajan belonged to the Brahmin community, his caste identity was not highlighted in the film. This decision has sparked online debates, reminiscent of the controversy surrounding “Soorarai Pottru” for a similar reason.

Addressing these queries during the “Amaran” success event, Rajkumar Periyasamy shared insight into the approach, stating, “Mukund’s wife, Indhu, had a clear vision for how he should be represented. She requested that Mukund be identified as a Tamilian, and emphasized that his legacy as an Indian soldier and Tamilian was all that mattered. In every sense, Mukund saw himself as an Indian first, and we respected that in the film.”

Periyasamy continued, “Amaran is a tribute to Major Mukund Varadarajan’s bravery and selfless service to the nation, beyond any caste identity. Honoring his life and the prestigious Ashok Chakra he earned, the film celebrates his heroism, reflecting the soldier he was, free of labels and divisions.” The director’s explanation is currently doing rounds on social media.